Iceweasel and DRM

[Zenaan Harkness]

On 5/20/14, Jerry Stuckle <jstuckle at attglobal.net> wrote:
> On 5/19/2014 9:00 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle <jstuckle at attglobal.net> wrote:
>>> On 5/19/2014 8:33 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>>>> On 20/05/14 00:23, Richard Hector wrote:
>>>>> On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>> You cannot link to an image on my site.  But you can provide a link
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> that image.  An important difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> I confess I don't see that difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that the link must be visible and not clickable?
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I'd still like to see a reference to a law (in your chosen
>>>>> jurisdiction) that forbids whatever kind of link you say isn't
>>>>> permitted.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I guess you're talking about inline image links, eg <img
>>>> src="http://someone-elses-server/image.jpg">
>>>>
>>>> That issue seems to be still up for debate, with strong views on both
>>>> sides.
>>>
>>> Only on the internet is it up for debate.
>>
>> In no other forums does such debate occur, of course...
>
> Wrong.  I've seen it time and time again.

Whoosh.

(You say "A", I say (trying to be sarcastic, like the condescending
twad I am) "oh of course, A" and then you come back with "wrong, not
A".
Seriously?
I admit that sarcasm is hard to read in email, but the consequences
are evidently sometimes humorous.)

Anyway, this beaten horse is lucky to even be glue at this point.


>> And that's right, what people say on the Internet is like, you know,
>> bathroom talk, it's not _real_ debate and can't possibly represent
>> peoples' _real_ views..
>
> Once again you can't discuss the facts to you make personal attacks.

My statement was actually a continuation of my sarcasm ... and
certainly not a personal attack.

I do see that there can be difficulty in interpreting sarcasm in
email, so I guess I should have been clearer.

Cheers
Zenaan