[D-m-team] Cleaning Uploaders -- a mistake?

[Paul Wise]

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 14:44 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:

> It *might* be worth having a short cut so that instead of having to
> become a DM, then get someone to sponsor your next upload so you can
> add DM-Upload-Allowed, and only then be able to make your next upload
> directly, to have a "Packages:" field in the changeset which serves as
> a way of retrospectively adding DM-U-A to the current version of the
> package in the archive.

I think it makes sense to have potential DMs mention a set of packages
they'd like to be able to upload immediately after becoming a DM, but
this might mean that the DM team would have to evaluate the work the DM
has done on the set of packages they ask for, which might be too much
extra work for the team to take on.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/d-m-team/attachments/20080117/d2d28a05/attachment.pgp