[Debian-hebrew-package] [svn] r296 - pkg/hocr/trunk/debian

[Lior Kaplan]

Nope, no RC bugs.

But due to Kobi great advancment in hocr features, the version in
testing is very old. I'd like first to see a new version there, and than
add the binding package.

I also don't know of anyone using these binding, so there's no rush for
them.

Baruch Even wrote:
> I don't see the reason for this actually, NEW queue is not bad and
> you'll need to go through it anyway. Is there any critical bug we want
> fixed in testing that we don't want delayed?
> 
> Lior Kaplan wrote:
> 
>>I asked kobi to do the change.
>>
>>Since I don't want to go through the NEW queue with version 0.7.1 of
>>hocr. I'd like to wait for the next version.
>>
>>
>>On 1/4/06, Baruch Even <baruch at ev-en.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yaacov Zamir wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Author: kzamir-guest
>>>>Date: Wed Jan  4 14:46:52 2006
>>>>New Revision: 296
>>>>
>>>>Modified:
>>>>  pkg/hocr/trunk/debian/control
>>>>Log:
>>>>do not build python and perl bindings for hocr packages by default
>>>
>>>Care to explain why?
>>>
>>>Baruch
> 
> 

-- 

Lior Kaplan
kaplanlior at gmail.com
http://www.Guides.co.il

Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID)