[Debian-olpc-devel] Restructuring Git structure (Was: Anyone working on packaging sugar-turtleart-activity)

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:54:50PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>Currently all sugar packages are part of the collab-maint project on 
>alioth, which has the nice advantage that any Debian developer is 
>automatically a member and can commit and non DDs can get access easily 
>too.
>
>I'd just suggest to change the structure, currently there is:
>
>collab-maint/sugar-pippy
>collab-maint/sugar-chat
>and so on
>
>to:
>
>collab-maint/sugar/sugar-pippy
>collab-maint/sugar/sugar-chat
>...
>
>Jonas, what do you think?

I see no reason to subgroup Sugar packages.  It might even break some 
Git assumptions (e.g. gitweb) if not following what seems to me to be 
the basic structure: <accessgroup>/<git_repository>

Additionally, Petter just now is packaging something that is *both* 
Sugar-related and not.  Should it then be hardlinked/symlinked from 
.../sugar/... to e.g. .../gtk/... ?

To me it makes sense to e.g. coordinate teamwork on a team mailinglist, 
but do actual coding grouped by package, not subgrouped by team.


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknRSWEACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjmPwCfdK59eeyzPo0yyMn4yMrjAWEW
sCsAn0H6CC6WCaEOuOm1/wNicFTrJWpC
=t+vd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----