[Debian-olpc-devel] Review of sugar-record-activity

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:43:18AM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:09:45PM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
>> Please declare the copyright of aplay.py separately. I'd say it's 
>> probably safe to attribute it to One Laptop per Child.
>
>I've checked git and aplay.py was added by Aleksey in 2009-04-25 as 
>part of git hash 4ef0507 with a license but without a copyright.
>
>It is more likely that the copyright should be attributed to Aleksey 
>rather than One Laptop per Child.
>
>It would be good to get this fixed upstream too.

Indeed.

I'd say that generally it is bad to assume copyright or licensing: 
Instead kindly request upstream to improve any missing/uncertain 
copyright/licensing hints.


Kind regards,

  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20100722/56cfabde/attachment.pgp>