[Debian-ports-devel] debian-ports archive moving

[Hiroyuki Yamamoto]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi, all,

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Hiroyuki!
> 
> What about you? Would you be in favor of us all porters working together
> and allowing each other to do binNMUs in wanna-build for every architecture?
> 
> If yes, we would ask Aurelien to give all of us access to all ports architectures
> in wanna-build and I suggest we then extend Michael's Haskell binNMU script for
> all architectures which currently have ghc bootstrapped.
> 
> Adrian
> 
> On 05/29/2016 11:06 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> On 28.05.2016 18:17, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>>> I currently know of the following active porters:
>>>>
>>>> - David Anglin
>>>> - Helge Deller
>>>> - Michael Cree
>>>> - John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>>>> - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
>>>>
>>>> I would be happy to let anyone of the above do binNMUs for the architectures
>>>> that I maintain. I think if we joined forces, we could improve the state of
>>>> Debian Ports overall since we will be able to assist each other with the
>>>> wanna-build work etc.
>>>>
>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>
>>> Good idea!
>>> I'm for it!
>>
>> Yes, sounds good to me.
>>
>> Something else that would be useful is a ben tracker page for the
>> ports arches.  I have always run my own one so I can keep alpha up to
>> date but it would be nice if there was one that automatically copied
>> the ben files from the release team's transition tracker, and ran ben
>> for the ports arches on a regular basis.  (I think Nobuhiro once ran
>> one but I am presuming that has long fallen by the wayside.)
>>
>> Michael.
>> (alpha port)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debian-ports-devel mailing list
>> Debian-ports-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-ports-devel


Yes, it sounds to be good idea.

Quite honestly, because alpha, hppa, ppc64, sparc64 are already with GHCi and 
similar haskell packages can be built, I think that it should be "best" 
that haskell binNMU of ghc bootstraped debian-ports architectures is ordered by haskell team 
at the same and convenient time of official ports with a similar binNMU message, 
just as it is done in non-haskell packages.

If debian-ports binNMU ordered by haskell team is difficult, 
I think that we needs to do binNMU each other in debian-ports team.

Regards,
- -- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA  91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=y0Uh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----