[xml/sgml] Debian GNU/Linux reference card

Adam Di Carlo adam@onshored.com
Wed, 12 May 2004 09:58:27 -0400


"W. Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> writes:

>> Where your first choice is DDP, I second that.
>> I think it is more wise to put the effort in
>> getting it in DDP.
>
> I keep asking :-(

Why move it to DDP CVS when that is going to go away eventually 
anyhow?

>> Did we make noise at the right place?
>> Will refcard get in DDP CVS sooner by the discussion here?
>
> I don't think so, but I don't know.
>
>> I have no clue what translators prefer. ( refcard-lang.dbk or lang.po )
>
> I don't know, but in .po files, changed original strings
> can be spotted easily.  Support for translation is weak
> in DocBook/XML - it would be nice to have attributes for
> indicating elements "to be translated", "fuzzy" etc.

Is it really weak in Docbook?  Someone should formulate an RFE and I
can look at getting some universal attribute into some later version 
of Docbook.

-- 
...Adam Di Carlo...<adam@onshored.com>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>