[debpool] Re: Subversion repository up

Magnus Holmgren holmgren at lysator.liu.se
Wed Apr 11 07:52:36 UTC 2007


On Wednesday 11 April 2007 01:59, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Thanks,   it  works   now    perfectly when  working    with  a single
> arch. However if I try a binary upload of package  which is already in
> the pool, but with another arch, I get this error:
>
> 2007-04-11 01:57:32 [GENERAL/INFO] Processing changefile
> 'vkeybd_0.1.17a-1_amd64.changes' 2007-04-11 01:57:32 [GENERAL/DEBUG]
> Version comparison for 'vkeybd': proposed version for sid (1:0.1.17a-1) is
> not greater than current version (1:0.1.17a-1) 2007-04-11 01:57:32
> [INSTALL/WARNING] Cannot install version 1:0.1.17a-1 of vkeybd to sid
> 2007-04-11 01:57:32 [REJECT/ERROR] No valid distributions for version
> 1:0.1.17a-1 of vkeybd 2007-04-11 01:57:32 [GENERAL/DEBUG] Exiting.

I've applied all the changes from Andreas's version pertaining to binary-only 
uploads, so I think I'll let him answer... :-)

The thing is that there is only one version check. There would actually need 
to be one version check per package and architecture. (Each binary package 
can have a version completely different from the source, and each 
architecture can have been rebuilt a different number of times.)

One question is how strict the checks should be. In addition to checking that 
the version is increasing, we might want to check that a binary-only upload 
doesn't change the upstream version of any binary package.

Ideas?

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren at lysator.liu.se
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debpool-devel/attachments/20070411/a90c30e5/attachment-0001.pgp


More information about the Debpool-devel mailing list