[debpool] Does it make sense to convert to debpool now?

[Magnus Holmgren]

On Tuesday 17 April 2007 12:49, Marc Haber wrote:
> $ cat exim4/00distributions
> => sarge
> exim4-base_4.63-11~zg1_i386.deb
> exim4-config_4.63-11~zg1_all.deb
> exim4-daemon-heavy-dbg_4.63-11~zg1_i386.deb
> exim4-daemon-heavy_4.63-11~zg1_i386.deb
> exim4-daemon-light-dbg_4.63-11~zg1_i386.deb
> exim4-daemon-light_4.63-11~zg1_i386.deb
> exim4-dbg_4.63-11~zg1_i386.deb
> exim4_4.63-11.dsc
> exim4_4.63-11~zg1.dsc
> exim4_4.63-11~zg1_all.deb
> eximon4_4.63-11~zg1_i386.deb

Hmm - so it's completely OK to more than one version of the same package in 
the same suite, component and arch?

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren at lysator.liu.se
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debpool-devel/attachments/20070420/0ba6d653/attachment.pgp