[debpool] Re: Does it make sense to convert to debpool now?
Free Ekanayaka
freee at debian.org
Tue Apr 17 14:26:42 UTC 2007
|--==> Magnus Holmgren writes:
MH> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 12:49, Marc Haber wrote:
>>[...] This goes
>>without need to recompile and without need to reupload, it is just a
>>change in the 00distlist file.
>>
>>For me, it is vital to have the distribution list sitting in the same
>>directory as the package files.
>>
>>How would I handle an arrangement like this with debpool? Is it
>>possible? If yes, would it be wise to use the version currently in
>>experimental, or do I have to expect major changes in configuration
>>when your first package is being uploaded?
MH> [...] One question though: Does it happen that you have only some of the binary
MH> packages from a certain source package in a certain distribution?
Such a situation never happened to me, and I would say it's corner case.
MH> Otherwise
MH> it seems rather redundant (although I guess it could be how your program
MH> knows what records to include in the Packages files.
Yes, I agree.
Ciao,
Free
More information about the Debpool-devel
mailing list