[udd] injecting debtags information

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 17/09/08 at 20:39 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> That said, we have of course the choice between just having one tuple
> per package, with a field containing all associated tags (e.g.,
> comma-separated), and having one tuple for each pair <package, tag>.
> 
> I tend to prefer the latter, as we have already expressed relational
> algebra the different tags for each package, without needing to resort
> to sub-string machinery.

me too.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/attachments/20080918/b24d82ed/attachment.pgp