licensecheck: fixes and improvements
Benjamin Drung
bdrung at debian.org
Sun Oct 21 16:54:55 UTC 2012
Am Sonntag, den 21.10.2012, 12:35 +1100 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:07:50 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > For patch 1 you can find case in #688843 (as mentioned in patch header).
> > > In my email as of 12 of October I attached licensecheck.pl with embedded
> > > test case for this (see line 1212).
> >
> > I applied patch 1 and tested it against the attached
> > modified-BSD-2-clause.py, but licensecheck still detects it as "BSD (2
> > clause)". The patch seems to short for the proclaimed change.
> >
>
> You've used the wrong sample -- it's for the license that I posted on 11 of
> October. I'm attaching it here for your convenience.
Thanks. I have applied your patch and added a test case (I took the
source from abiword and reduced it to an test case).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/devscripts-devel/attachments/20121021/6e0ed5c4/attachment.pgp>
More information about the devscripts-devel
mailing list