[Dict-common-dev] Re: Including aspell pwli files in the dict-common policy?

[Domenico Andreoli]

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> cavok@filibusta.crema.unimi.it (Domenico Andreoli) writes:
> 
> > i don't think we should enforce a strict naming scheme, people is still
> > able to read description of the packagesa. i propose the slighter cheme
> > aspell-<language_code>[-whatever]
> 
> For single dictionary packages this <whatever> could be taken from the
> pwli-file. Would it be enough to use the <jargon>-tag?
> 
> The package providing the <language>-aspell.pwli should be named
> aspell-<language>.
> 
yes, it seems ok to me

> Other packages with multiple dictionaries could invent a <jargon> tag
> for the package as a whole.
> 
also here it is ok

anyway i wouldn't force that every jargon/spelling stays in a separate
package, nor that aspell-<language> contains every jargon/spelling.


-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50