[Dwn-trans-commit] CVS french/2008/14

[CVS User jeb-guest]

Update of /cvsroot/dwn-trans/french/2008/14
In directory alioth:/tmp/cvs-serv19166

Modified Files:
	index.EN.wml index.wml 
Log Message:
Correction de Brice Favre


--- /cvsroot/dwn-trans/french/2008/14/index.EN.wml	2008/11/09 01:57:29	1.2
+++ /cvsroot/dwn-trans/french/2008/14/index.EN.wml	2008/11/15 15:10:25	1.3
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
 <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/10/msg00005.html">proposed</a> changes in the way
 Debian membership is handled. The motivation for these changes is to make it possible for people
 who contribute to Debian without maintaining packages (such as translators or documentation writers)
-to become members of the project. He later <a href="http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2008/10/24/developer-status.html">wrote</a>
-some comments additional to his proposal. However due to the scope of the envisioned changes, several developers
+to become members of the project.  He later <a href="http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2008/10/24/developer-status.html">wrote</a>
+some comments additional to his proposal.  However due to the scope of the envisioned changes, several developers
 proposed to <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00193.html">stop these changes until</a>
 they have been decided upon via a general resolution, while Peter Palfrader
 <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00266.html">asked</a> to be allowed to continue trying to solve
@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@
 
 <p>Lars Wirzenius and others would like to see the whole
 <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00145.html">membership system rethought</a>, not only the process
-by which membership is granted. Lars proposed that membership must be periodically renewed, while
+by which membership is granted.  Lars proposed that membership must be periodically renewed, while
 <q>People should be allowed to join Debian when there is reasonably widespread consensus that they
 agree with the project's goals, are committed to working on those goals, and are trustworthy.</q></p>
 
 <p>Martin Krafft <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00061.html">argued</a> that instead of introducing
 different classes of membership Debian should instead define different privileges and criteria for how to obtain
-them. Since these privileges already exist it would be easier to define the criteria instead of mapping the
+them.  Since these privileges already exist it would be easier to define the criteria instead of mapping the
 privileges to classes.</p>
 
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
 
 <p>To help clean up release critical bug reports, especially longstanding ones,
 Josselin Mouette <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/10/msg00004.html">initiated</a>
-the first Bug Sprint. In this competition, Debian Developers and other interested people volunteered
+the first Bug Sprint.  In this competition, Debian Developers and other interested people volunteered
 to try to fix their assigned release-critical bugs in a five day period. The winners in this competition
 would get cookies.</p>
 
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
 
 <p>Ben Finney <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00368.html">wondered</a> about several release-critical
 bugs getting the <tt>lenny-ignore</tt> tag, which specifies that these bugs are not considered release critical for the upcoming
-release of Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 <q>Lenny</q>. Release Manager Marc Brockschmidt
+release of Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 <q>Lenny</q>.  Release Manager Marc Brockschmidt
 <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00369.html">explained</a> that <q>In all of the bugs I recently tagged,
 the DFSG violation is usually a formal problem, something that other
 distributions and upstream don't consider a problem at all. While fixing
@@ -112,12 +112,12 @@
 
 <p>In the following discussion, Robert Millan <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00107.html">proposed</a>
 a general resolution on how to deal with packages violating the
-<a href="http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines">Debian Free Software Guidelines</a>. In his proposal, packages having
+<a href="http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines">Debian Free Software Guidelines</a>.  In his proposal, packages having
 a bug report open regarding their compliance with the Debian Free Software Guidelines for a certain amount of time
-must be moved from the <tt>main</tt> section to the <tt>non-free</tt> section. In his response to Robert's initial
-<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00010.html"> proposal</a>, Release Wizard Steve Langasek
+must be moved from the <tt>main</tt> section to the <tt>non-free</tt> section.  In his response to Robert's initial
+<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00010.html">proposal</a>, Release Wizard Steve Langasek
 <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00128.html">argued</a> that Debian has been following the road of
-incremental improvement. He notes that all bugs reported regarding non-free
+incremental improvement.  He notes that all bugs reported regarding non-free
 firmware for older releases have been dealt with.</p>
 
 
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@
 
 <p>Aurelien Jarno <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00071.html">wondered</a> whether the NEW queue (where
 uploaded source packages creating new binary packages are held back awaiting the check and approval of an ftp-master)
-is currently being processed. Joerg Jaspert <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00180.html">answered</a> that
-the NEW queue has indeed not been processed very often recently. He explained further that changes in the software used to
+is currently being processed.  Joerg Jaspert <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00180.html">answered</a> that
+the NEW queue has indeed not been processed very often recently.  He explained further that changes in the software used to
 process this queue give precedence to packages that only add new binary components, as distinct from packages that add completely
 new code to the archive.</p>
 
@@ -142,23 +142,23 @@
 <a href="http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2008/11/02/archivedebianorg-old-bugs-and.html">highlighted</a> that the
 unofficial port of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 <q>Sarge</q> to the AMD64 architecture has been moved there, too.</p>
 
-<p>Other changes are the availability of binary packages for Debian GNU/Linux 1.2 <q>Rex</q>, 1.1 <q>Buzz</q> and 0.93R6. An
+<p>Other changes are the availability of binary packages for Debian GNU/Linux 1.2 <q>Rex</q>, 1.1 <q>Buzz</q> and 0.93R6.  An
 archive for packages from <a href="http://www.debian.org/volatile/">volatile.debian.org</a>,
 <a href="http://www.debian.org/security/">security.debian.org</a> and <a href="http://www.backports.org">www.backports.org</a>
 is now also available at archive.debian.org.</p>
 
 <p>During work on this, old mail archives from 1995, which had been lost, were found again as well as old bug
-reports ranging from bug #350 to #1750. These will soon be added back to the appropriate archives.</p>
+reports ranging from bug #350 to #1750.  These will soon be added back to the appropriate archives.</p>
 
 
 <p><strong>BTS link in need of new maintainer</strong></p>
 
 <p>Pierre Habouzit <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/10/msg00006.html">announced</a> that
-he won't be able to maintain and run the BTS link service any more. This service is used to track activity
+he won't be able to maintain and run the BTS link service any more.  This service is used to track activity
 in upstream bug tracking systems and update the corresponding bug reports in
-Debian's BTS in a semi-automated way. Currently this service needs to be run manually. Don Armstrong,
+Debian's BTS in a semi-automated way.  Currently this service needs to be run manually. Don Armstrong,
 one of the maintainers of Debian's BTS, <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00860.html">highlighted</a>
-the importance of the bts-link service, but won't be able to maintain it himself. Christoph Berg
+the importance of the bts-link service, but won't be able to maintain it himself.  Christoph Berg
 <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2008/10/msg00066.html">suggested</a> maintainership under the mantle
 of Debian's Quality Assurance group if someone would volunteer to act as the main responsible maintainer.</p>
 
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
 <li><a href="http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/dns323-firmware-tools">\
 	dns323-firmware-tools -- build and manipulate firmware images for the DNS-323</a></li>
 <li><a href="http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/dwdiff">\
-	dwdiff -- font-end fof the diff program that operates word by word</a></li>
+	dwdiff -- front-end for the diff program that operates word by word</a></li>
 <li><a href="http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/elfrc">\
 	elfrc -- convert arbitrary files into elf objects</a></li>
 <li><a href="http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/etoolbox">\
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
 
 <p><strong>Work-needing packages</strong></p>
 
-<p>Currently 498 packages are orphaned and 118 packages are up for adoption. Please take a look
+<p>Currently 498 packages are orphaned and 118 packages are up for adoption.  Please take a look
 at the <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00609.html">recent</a>
 <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00869.html">reports</a> to see if there are packages
 you are interested in or view the complete list of
--- /cvsroot/dwn-trans/french/2008/14/index.wml	2008/11/11 22:36:59	1.11
+++ /cvsroot/dwn-trans/french/2008/14/index.wml	2008/11/15 15:10:25	1.12
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
 détaillée auparavant</a>). En fin de compte, il a été globalement très
 satisfait des résultats. Stefano Zacchiroli <a
 href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/10/msg00887.html">a
-proposé</a> de répéter cette événement.</p>
+proposé</a> de répéter cet événement.</p>
 
 
 <p><strong>Microcode dans Lenny et comment faire avec les paquets ne