Statue of fatback in Debian

[Michael Prokop]

* Christophe Monniez <christophe.monniez at fccu.be> [20100108 07:42]:
> Le jeudi 07 janvier 2010 à 18:05 +0100, Michael Prokop a écrit :

> > has anyone of tried to resolve the situation of fatback?
[...]

> I did not try to solve the situtation ... that seems unsolvable.
> As far as I'm not very happy with the use of fatback (not good results)
> and the fact that the licenses are not suitable for inclusion into
> Debian, I propose to not package fatback and concentrate our effort on
> better tools.

Thanks for update and information.

Juan, any objections against closing the ITP:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512483

?

regards,
-mika-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/forensics-devel/attachments/20100113/a15c5963/attachment.pgp>