[gopher] Updated Gopher RFC

[Nuno J. Silva]

On 2012-05-19, Nick Matavka wrote:

> I have an idea for selectors.  There is a large difference between
> word processing files and page layout languages, so I recommend
> keeping both d and p selectors.  d could be for word processing
> documents such as Word, OpenOffice, and WordPerfect, and p could be
> for page layout and markup languages such as LaTeX, PDF, PostScript,
> and Rich Text Format. 

About LaTeX, I believe either you're serving the code as something for
the user to read (hence type 0 or another type that gets established for
alternate encodings), or you're serving the set of source files, which
the user will have to download an unpack.

In this case, I believe a "document" item type does not apply, it's
either 0 or 9, depending on whether it's a short snippet of code that
you can serve as-is or a tarball with the files.

> I've got a bunch of good ideas, so I've been
> working on a draft RFC that I will later publish.


-- 
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)
gopher://sdf-eu.org/1/users/njsg
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/