[gopher] Gopher+ support in the community

[James Mills]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
wrote:

> I'm not opposed to Gopher over TLS, but I definitely would not want it to
> be
> mandatory, and it would increase client burden as well particularly with
> respect to certificate management.
>

+1 on Gopher over TLS being optional.

gophers:// and port 7433?
(It doesn't seem to be taken according to the register[1])

cheers
James

[1]:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt

James Mills / prologic

E: prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/gopher-project/attachments/20150423/660b827e/attachment.html>