[gopher] Gopher+ support in the community

[Kevin Veroneau]

I also concur about your thoughts on Gopher+.  I'd personally like to develop a more modern extension that would both be easier to implement on server and client side.

Yes, perhaps having a separate thread for TLS would be good.

On April 23, 2015 9:47:00 AM MDT, simple at sdf.org wrote:
>James Mills <prologic at shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Cameron Kaiser
><spectre at floodgap.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not opposed to Gopher over TLS, but I definitely would not want
>it to
>> > be
>> > mandatory, and it would increase client burden as well particularly
>with
>> > respect to certificate management.
>> >
>>
>> +1 on Gopher over TLS being optional.
>
>I'm also in support of optional TLS.  As for gopher+ I think it's the
>proverbial kicked dead equine. BTW, why are we discussing TLS in a
>"gopher+" thread?  They aren't really related - better to give TLS its
>own thread, no?
>
>Jeff / gopher://jgw.mdns.org
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gopher-Project mailing list
>Gopher-Project at lists.alioth.debian.org
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/gopher-project/attachments/20150423/3f4c4cae/attachment.html>