[gopher] Gopher+ support in the community

[simple at sdf.org]

James Mills <prologic at shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not opposed to Gopher over TLS, but I definitely would not want it to
> > be
> > mandatory, and it would increase client burden as well particularly with
> > respect to certificate management.
> >
>
> +1 on Gopher over TLS being optional.

I'm also in support of optional TLS.  As for gopher+ I think it's the
proverbial kicked dead equine. BTW, why are we discussing TLS in a
"gopher+" thread?  They aren't really related - better to give TLS its
own thread, no?

Jeff / gopher://jgw.mdns.org