[gopher] Adding TLS and/or SSL support to Gopher

James Mills prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
Thu Apr 23 21:00:27 UTC 2015


I actually quite like this idea to start with :)

cheers
James


James Mills / prologic

E: prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:18 AM, <simple at sdf.org> wrote:

> New thread for an important topic :)
>
> Looking in my OS's /etc/services file it appears there are several
> available ports in the 700-799 range:
>
> #                   703               Unassigned
> #                   708               Unassigned
> #                 717-728             Unassigned
> #                   703               Unassigned
> #                   708               Unassigned
> #                 717-728             Unassigned
> #                 732-740             Unassigned
> #                   743               Unassigned
> #                 745-746             Unassigned
> #                 755-756             Unassigned
> #                   766               Unassigned
> #                   768               Unassigned
> #                 778-779             Unassigned
> #                 781-785             Unassigned
> #                   786               Unassigned
> #                   787               Unassigned
> #                 788-799             Unassigned
>
> As for implementation of the concept, I feel it should be done in a way
> that doesn't shut out existing gopher clients/servers.
>
> Perhaps adopting some sort of external client+server proxy model would be
> the best starting point such that, for example, someone with a lynx(1)
> browser could install a "secure_gopher" proxy on their computer such that
> their now local port 70 requests are SSL-wrapped and sent on to a
> corresponding "secure_gopher" proxy server listening on the new gopherS
> TLS encrypted port (785 maybe?). Probably it's already doable using
> opensshd and SOCKS, just need to pick a port.
>
> The above approach would not preclude others from basically incorporating
> the proxy model into their new clients and servers for an all-in-one
> solution.
>
> For making it officially part of Gopher World I think it means a new RFC
> for "secure gopher" or at least adding the spec to the existing gopher
> RFC; I don't know which would be easier.
>
> Jeff / gopher://jgw.mdns.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gopher-Project mailing list
> Gopher-Project at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/gopher-project/attachments/20150424/a4fe1c8c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gopher-Project mailing list