[Letsencrypt-devel] RFS: python-lecm/0.0.4-1: Let's Encrypt Manager (ITP: #840641)
Sebastien Badia
seb at sebian.fr
Thu Oct 20 23:41:25 UTC 2016
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:46:06AM (+0200), Sebastien Badia wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:40:03PM (+0000), Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > * you are also shipping a binary in /usr/bin; that imho shouldn't be in
> > a package named python3-* which usually denotes a library, or anyway
> > an application which implementation language matters.
> > I do not know lecm, but I'd probably name everything 'lecm', or
> > perhaps only the python library in a binary python3-lecm.
> > but I'm not sure if what I'm saying makes sense for this case.
> > (note that also lintian notices this, with
> > library-package-name-for-application)
>
> Yeah! I asked myself the question, and indeed, it's only a binary, so you're
> right. Should rename also the source package?
Hello,
Any comment about this point?
Anyway, I just imported a new release, and addressed all points mentioned here,
(thanks for the review!)
If you want to take a look :)
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/letsencrypt/python-lecm.git
Thanks in advance!
Seb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/letsencrypt-devel/attachments/20161021/1ce799c3/attachment.sig>
More information about the Letsencrypt-devel
mailing list