[Letsencrypt-devel] RFS: python-lecm/0.0.4-1: Let's Encrypt Manager (ITP: #840641)

[Sebastien Badia]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:46:06AM (+0200), Sebastien Badia wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:40:03PM (+0000), Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > * you are also shipping a binary in /usr/bin; that imho shouldn't be in
> >   a package named python3-* which usually denotes a library, or anyway
> >   an application which implementation language matters.
> >   I do not know lecm, but I'd probably name everything 'lecm', or
> >   perhaps only the python library in a binary python3-lecm.
> >   but I'm not sure if what I'm saying makes sense for this case.
> >   (note that also lintian notices this, with
> >   library-package-name-for-application)
> 
> Yeah! I asked myself the question, and indeed, it's only a binary, so you're
> right. Should rename also the source package?

Hello,

Any comment about this point?

Anyway, I just imported a new release, and  addressed all points mentioned here,
(thanks for the review!)

If you want to take a look :)

  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/letsencrypt/python-lecm.git

Thanks in advance!

Seb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/letsencrypt-devel/attachments/20161021/1ce799c3/attachment.sig>