debian package and 0.39_beta thoughts

Sat Dec 5 20:26:49 UTC 2009

> Right. I missed this point since I was very busy last few months and didn't get
> a look at the git evolution. :/

> So we have 2 ways for solving this issue:
> - Re-do the Makefile as it was before
> - Add a debian patch for updating the current Makefile in the way we want.

a 0.39-rc1 is already present in the master branch. So maybe we should merge master and (upstream/stable) to generate a new
package with the right Makefile.

also numbering with three digits is better that this -beta or -rc thing. 0.39 is already a pre release for the 0.40 version ;). It cause problem during the debian process. is 0.39_beta > 0.39-rc1 ???

So I would vote for lisaac-0.39.1.tar.gz

> If the team agree to move the stable branch to upstream it is done. We can
> create the pristine-tar branch, it's not annoying. And the debian branch already
> exists.

yes the debian one is already there, the pristine-tar would be generated by git-buildpackage.
so no need to generate it for me :)

thanks

Frederic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3370 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/lisaac-devel/attachments/20091205/ab7f812b/attachment.bin>