debian package and 0.39_beta thoughts

Sat Dec 5 22:41:26 UTC 2009

> Hi,

> Well, there was a lot of complains about the Makefile and that it should
> by default run install_lisaac.li. There was also the problem that
> shorter.c is no longer in the bin directory (at least in the repository)
> and that was a problem with install_lisaac.

> So, Ben (I suppose) decided to remove everything and only include stuff
> for install_lisaac.

> When I merged this specific part to the stable branch, I just kept most
> of the old things in the makefile, while keeping the default behaviour
> desired for install_lisaac. But of course this was never merged back in
> the master branch and never appeared in the beta.

> I suppose this will find its way in the next beta release.

Yes bu not compleatly . We really need to merge stable into master at least one time.
before going further.

> Now, I think I created a tag: lisaac-0.39b

> http://git.debian.org/?p=lisaac/compiler.git;a=shortlog;h=a23685f842d6d34a8da2e78e6ca04be22780ad33

Yes :), but it is on no branch...

> I think a dedicated repository, Creating a debian branch is fine I think
> (even if that raised some questions here) but having that many branches
> just for debian would create too much confusion.

having only one pristine-tar branch for debian is not that a big deal :)

See you

Frederic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3562 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/lisaac-devel/attachments/20091205/a10f553f/attachment-0001.bin>