[Ltrace-devel] ltrace on ppc32 [Was: Re: ltrace is_weak patch]
pmachata at redhat.com
Mon Aug 28 17:56:33 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 17:12 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 23:44 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:43:27PM +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> > > We had observed a few problem with current existing is_weak patch in
> > > ltrace-0.5. __gmon_start__ was getting added even when is_weak
> > > condition was introduced in process_breakpoint() function.
> > Petr Machata mentioned something very similar to me, but was unhappy
> > with a similar fix IIRC. Petr, can you comment?
> The patch posted by Sharyathi Nagesh is, I believe, targeted against my
> quick fedora fix. That fedora fix is basically abusing the fact that
My funky English doesn't do a good service here. I meant it's done on
top of my fedora fix, not that it's aiming to destroy the fix :)
More information about the Ltrace-devel