[mgt-devel] delay it for a few days please.
Craig Sanders
cas at taz.net.au
Mon Feb 18 22:56:28 UTC 2008
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:08:20PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:48:31AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > i guess one important question to find out the answer to is:
> >
> > is vte inherently slow or does Gnome Terminal just use it badly - or
> > use features that we don't need in MGT?
>
> that's why I'd appreciate testing my code because it uses vte too.
ok, just compiled tabterm. seems ok for v0.01.
some very lame timing tests, running "time ls -l /usr/lib":
multi-gnome-terminal (264 columns x x86 lines, font
"-schumacher-clean-medium-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-c-*-koi8-r"):
real 0m0.327s
user 0m0.064s
sys 0m0.088s
tabterm (227 columns x 74 lines, font "fixed 11"):
real 0m6.002s
user 0m0.036s
sys 0m0.068s
> Seems we will be using zvt.
it seems significantly faster. 0.327s vs 6.002s. about 18x faster.
> P.S this comment sounds interesting too:
> http://foolab.org/node/1734#comment-18071
BTW, these timing tests were performed on a machine with a Dell 2407 24"
LCD, with subpixel smoothing enabled.
craig
--
craig sanders <cas at taz.net.au>
BOFH excuse #250:
Program load too heavy for processor to lift.
More information about the multignometerm-devel
mailing list