[Neurodebian-devel] OpenSesame 0.27

[Sebastiaan Mathot]

Progress. I updated the copyright file and (hopefully) fixed the manpages. 
Now, neither `cme check dpkg-copyright` or `lintian opensesame_0.27-1.dsc` 
given any warnings.

And, indeed, my version of cme is old: 2.005-1. Does the warning that you get 
refer to line 15 of debian/copyright? And is it a problem?

	License: Apache-2.0

As far as I can tell <http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-
format/1.0/#license-specification>, this is a valid license specification, 
right?

Latest snapshot: <https://github.com/smathot/OpenSesame/tree/debian>

On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 01:33:45 PM Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Sebastiaan Mathot wrote:
> > > $> dep5_verify
> > > Warning in 'Format' value 'Format:
> > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/':
> > > Format
> > > does not match the recommended URL for DEP-5 Configuration item
> > > 'Debian::Dpkg::Copyright Format' has a wrong value: value 'Format:
> > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/' does
> > > not
> > > match regexp ^http://
> > 
> > There's no output anymore, so I guess that's good. Unless it should give
> > output on succes, in which case no check.
> 
> check
> 
> > 	W: opensesame source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph
> > 	at
> > 
> > line 12)
> 
> uncheck ;)
> 
> $> grep -n '^License' copyright
> 8:License: GPL-3
> 15:Licenses: Apache-2.0
> 28:Licenses: GPL-2+
> 36:Licenses: GPL-3
> 41:Licenses: GPL-3
> 45:Licenses: GPL-3
> 51:Licenses: CC-BY-3.0
> 
> -- there is no "Licenses" field in DEP5, so lintian was correct ;)
> 
> also, interestingly my verify does warn me
> 
> $> dep5_verify
> Configuration item 'Files:"resources/*.ttf" License short_name' has a wrong
> value: Undefined mandatory value.
> 
> that was with cme 2.021-3  ... installing 2.029-1 which says that 2.026-1
> all dpkg related stuff moved to libconfig-model-dpkg-perl so installing
> that one as well... dep5_verify still complains -- so I guess you have even
> older cme than I had?
-- 
http://www.cogsci.nl/smathot