[Nm-templates-discuss] templates nm_pp.txt,1.46,1.47
he@haydn.debian.org
he@haydn.debian.org
Update of /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates
In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv25277
Modified Files:
nm_pp.txt
Log Message:
Add 2 new questions to see how people check DFSG freeness (and if they've
read the draft for the DFSG FAQ)
Index: nm_pp.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates/nm_pp.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.46
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -u -d -r1.46 -r1.47
--- nm_pp.txt 21 Nov 2004 18:07:45 -0000 1.46
+++ nm_pp.txt 29 Nov 2004 19:57:32 -0000 1.47
@@ -46,6 +46,13 @@
licensed under the FDL in main and what the consequences of this
position might be for Debian.
+5b. How do *you* check if a license is DFSG-compatible?
+
+5c. There are a few "tests" for this purpose, they are based on [not
+ really] common situations. Do you know one (or more) of these?
+ Explain it/them to me and point out which common problems can be
+ discovered by it/them.
+
6. Are there any sections of the DFSG or Social Contract that you
might like to see changed? If so, which ones, and why?