[Openstack-devel] python-dogpile.core_0.4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Michael Bayer]

Hi Thomas -

the .js files are part of the Sphinx documentation build.  My Python dist files include the Sphinx docs built out, the .js files are copied by Sphinx to be part of the docs, and I have done so for years, in all my projects including SQLAlchemy, Mako, Alembic, Dogpile Core, Dogpile Cache - SQLAlchemy is certainly present in many linux distros.      I'm not familiar with an issue here unless perhaps Sphinx did something different this time (not to mention Sphinx itself has these .js files in its distribution).

Perhaps build maintainers for Linux modify the build to not include the sphinx docs?  not sure.   You can create a buildfile by checking out the appropriate source tag and saying "python setup.py dist", the sphinx docs aren't built automatically so they'd be omitted.

- mike


On Sep 9, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:

> On 09/08/2013 06:00 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> some files in docs/ have different licenses and copyright holders.
>> Some of them are compressed, so their correspondent uncompressed versions
>> should be provided instead, or removed from the package.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Luca
> 
> Hi Luca,
> 
> Thanks for this review.
> 
> I thought it was ok-ish for the doc folders since we have such in Debian
> already. Sorry, wont happen again, and will file bugs when I see it on
> other packages.
> 
> I decided to remove the docs folder, until upstream (hereby, Mike Bayer
> is CC:-ed) replies to my mail and fixes it.
> 
> Mike, as per above, the python-dogpile.core package can't be uploaded to
> Debian together with its docs folder, because of obfuscated/compressed
> javascript libraries. Could you release a new version without these?
> Otherwise, the Debian package will have no docs, since I don't have the
> time to do the work of replacing minimized javascript. Also, I honestly
> don't really see the point in IMO wasting time trying to optimize
> javascript for docs, so I don't think it maters much anyway... (let me
> know if you think otherwise)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> P.S: Package re-uploaded
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/openstack-devel/attachments/20130909/1cf57eff/attachment.sig>