a couple of fixes
gregor herrmann
gregoa at debian.org
Fri Aug 7 14:52:15 UTC 2009
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:24:43 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > It's a good catch. But if those went to "ready for upload" you will
> > lose the highlight that there are rc bugs to be solved there... I don'
> > t know, maybe it's better that way. What do others think?
> I'd think (while looking around for my dusty uploader hat) that having
> the RC-buggy packages that are ready for upload in the 'Ready for
> upload' section is what I'd expect.
Me too.
> Losing the highlight would be unfortunate, though, as one will miss
> where to start uploading from.
I tend to start with looking at "ready for upload" packages that have
something listed in the "bugs" column.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Peter Ratzenbeck: I wish I was in Belfast town
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pet-devel/attachments/20090807/c41030ea/attachment.pgp>
More information about the PET-devel
mailing list