PET confused with tags?

[gregor herrmann]

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:46:16 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:

> As can be seen in [1][2], PET complains that there is a missing tag,
> but the tag is present. Maybe it is confused because there is a higher
> version tag (0.26 vs 0.26~repack)?
> 
> [1] http://pet.debian.net/pkg-multimedia/pet.cgi
> [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/liblo.git

Or because the tag name doesn't match the version?
debian/0.26_repack-7 vs. 0.26~repack-7
Not sure if this is the case, but I'm seeing something like this also
in pkg-perl.

Ansgar?

> BTW, our PET doesn't seem to be listed in pet.debian.net. Could you
> please add it?

I've added pkg-multimedia to the website in svn; the problem is that
the update of the real website from svn doesn't seem to work anymore
:/

Ah, here we are. A manual svn up on wagner helps (I guess the cronjob
got lost during the Alioth split last year). 

Cheers,
gregor 
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Status Quo: Red Sky
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pet-devel/attachments/20120816/68aa3dc7/attachment.pgp>