PET confused with tags?

Felipe Sateler fsateler at debian.org
Fri Aug 17 16:07:08 UTC 2012


Thanks for CCing me. I forgot to add it, but please CC me, I'm not suscribed.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:58 AM, gregor herrmann <gregoa at debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:46:16 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> As can be seen in [1][2], PET complains that there is a missing tag,
>> but the tag is present. Maybe it is confused because there is a higher
>> version tag (0.26 vs 0.26~repack)?
>>
>> [1] http://pet.debian.net/pkg-multimedia/pet.cgi
>> [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/liblo.git
>
> Or because the tag name doesn't match the version?
> debian/0.26_repack-7 vs. 0.26~repack-7
> Not sure if this is the case, but I'm seeing something like this also
> in pkg-perl.

Note that in the same team we have csound, which also has a ~dfsg
suffix, and is not marked in error.

> Ansgar?
>
>> BTW, our PET doesn't seem to be listed in pet.debian.net. Could you
>> please add it?
>
> I've added pkg-multimedia to the website in svn; the problem is that
> the update of the real website from svn doesn't seem to work anymore
> :/
>
> Ah, here we are. A manual svn up on wagner helps (I guess the cronjob
> got lost during the Alioth split last year).

Thanks!


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler



More information about the PET-devel mailing list