[pkg-bioc] CVS %p
Steffen Moeller
steffen_moeller at gmx.de
Sat Apr 21 17:30:33 UTC 2007
Hello,
I meant platforms of Debian, so I must admit. Since we do not have any scripts
associated with out packages, it should be fairly straight forward though to
use alien for the preparation of other distribution's packages.
> > a) Debian is generally good for the provisioning of runtime environments
> > since the platform does not matter - the packages are available on them
> > all b) We can seamlessly redo our automated builds on arbitrary platforms
> > and achieve the same cross-platformness even when not using the Debian
> > infrastructure directly.
>
> Can we? Or don't we have explicit/implicit dependencies of
> "Debianness" in terms of
>
> a) package availability,
I do not think that this will be an issue for the vast majority of packages
> b) naming (!!) [ almost every distro calls, say, Postgres libs
> something else ]
indeed, this is an issue, I do not know if alien manages this. The use of
the "_" in package names is different.
> c) infrastructure (pbuilder, ...)
I think we should go the "alien"-route if we seek for packages beyond Debian.
> > As Dirk pointed out, we are opting for b) with some bits in a).
>
> Maybe we we are able to 'b-1)': redo on "arbitrary hardware provided
> it runs Debian testing" :)
yip, this is what I actually meant.
> As Henry Ford said: You can have the car in any color provided it is
> black.
:-) but some alien help with recolo(u)ring.
Cheers,
Steffen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bioc-devel/attachments/20070421/74fdb5f4/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-bioc-devel
mailing list