[pkg-bioc] CVS %p

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

On 6 June 2007 at 10:06, David Vernazobres wrote:
| On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:25:12AM +0000, CVS User smoe-guest wrote :
| > * Should we possibly deprecate the use of "bioc" as a repository name? I think this is mostly
| >   historic and should go ... bioc-1.9 and bioc-2.0 are the current ones, I think. probably
| >   bioc-1.9 can go now, too.
| Do it! (well I know it's done, but I am for the removal!)

For as long as we only have one version of R packaged in Debian (as opposed
to having r-base-core as well as a hypothetical r-devel package), does it
make sense to assume that 
	bioc == bioc-$whatever.version.corresponds.to.current.R  
?

Just wondering, Dirk

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
                                                  -- Thomas A. Edison