[pkg-bioc] CVS %p

[David Vernazobres]

On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 08:05:01AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote :
> 
> On 6 June 2007 at 10:06, David Vernazobres wrote:
> | On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:25:12AM +0000, CVS User smoe-guest wrote :
> | > * Should we possibly deprecate the use of "bioc" as a repository name? I think this is mostly
> | >   historic and should go ... bioc-1.9 and bioc-2.0 are the current ones, I think. probably
> | >   bioc-1.9 can go now, too.
> | Do it! (well I know it's done, but I am for the removal!)
> 
> For as long as we only have one version of R packaged in Debian (as opposed
> to having r-base-core as well as a hypothetical r-devel package), does it
> make sense to assume that 
> 	bioc == bioc-$whatever.version.corresponds.to.current.R  
> ?
> 
I think that having a bioc-version is easier for the transition phase
(bioc-version -> bioc-version+1).
david