[pkg-bioc] paper seems fine, except ...
David Vernazobres
dv at uni-muenster.de
Fri May 25 10:02:24 UTC 2007
Back in front of my computers...
Thanks to all for your nice work.
david
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote :
> Hi Dirk et al.,
>
> the paper is fine, except that I could not find the \footnote{To whom
> correspondence should be addressed: edd at ...} Amazing that none of us spotted
> that before.
>
> The qtimes.sty that I downloaded from the web (first google hit) cannot
> provide slanted or bold fonts ... this is my interpretation at least. It
> looks on my machine far better with the qtimes commented out or by using
> times instead. Now, this is an issue with _my_ setup, I was only afraid that
> the organisers might run into similar issues. "apt-cache search qtimes" does
> not return anything. What should I install instead? And, should it be worth a
> comment in the .tex source?
$ apt-file search qtimes.sty
tetex-extra: usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty
tetex-extra: usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty
texlive-lang-polish: usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty
texlive-lang-polish: usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty
>
> On a sidenote: I just received about 20 mails from the list in one chunk,
> between a day and two days old, due to some semi-disturbing work on the mail
> servers and internet connections. It should be repared now as it seems, but
> who knows.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steffen
>
More information about the pkg-bioc-devel
mailing list