Bug#723977: [asdf-devel] Re: Bug#723977: missing symlink in /usr/share/common-lisp/systems

[Faré]

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
> Faré wrote:
>> Robert: when do you [intend] to release 3.0.3 ? Otherwise, I could do a Debian
>> package for 3.0.2.9. (PS: I took the liberty of also committing my
>> load-systems* patch).
>
> I was waiting on those two more UIOP patches (see the launchpad tracker
> -- sorry I'm on a plane so I can't look them up myself), but I agree
> that this needs a new version.
>
Which UIOP patches were you thinking of? I fixed a simple one
regarding ensure-function. I see other portability issues with
directory* and symlinks, but I am not competent to address them.

> I'll be OOT till Friday, but will try to run the full set of tests (they
> run on my laptop on all officially supported platforms), and if they
> pass,  we can release 3.0.3 then.
>
Excellent.

> I am afraid I still don't have the ability to test on linux, or to build
> the Debian package -- still without a linux platform on which to hack ASDF.
>
I can do that part, at least for the free software and proprietary
implementations for which I still have a license.

> I am still having mysterious problems with bundling on my tests on ABCL
> and ECL, but I am pretty sure that the errors on ECL have to do with its
> own incorrect detection of 32- vs. 64-bit.  ABCL is a bit more
> mysterious to me.  Haven't been able to get any help with either of
> these, so don't think they should be allowed to block progress on other
> implementations.
>
In case it means anything, tests pass on both ECL and ABCL on Linux x64.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Death is only a state of mind.

Only it doesn't leave you much time to think about anything else.