[Pkg-dns-devel] backporting knot-resolver

[Ondřej Surý]

It's probably not a problem, as stretch-backports doesn't have EDDSA
anyway.

So, yes, go ahead and lower the requirement.

Ondrej
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017, at 07:44, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2017-12-01 07:30:59 +0100, ondrej at sury.org wrote:
> > This is needed for API that exposes supported algoriths instead of 
> > hardcoding them.
> 
> Which algorithms?  For DNSSEC?  for TLS?  Whose API?  libknot?  or
> libkres?  What are the consequences of sticking with hardcoded
> algorithms?  What algorithms are hardcoded if we stick with
> LIBKNOT_MINVER?
> 
> Is there any reason why we should be concerned about sticking with the
> hardcoded algorithms for stretch-backports?
> 
>     --dkg