[Pkg-dns-devel] Alioth

[ondrej at sury.org]

Personally, I would prefer a separate group where we add whole collab-maint 
group with Developer access, but we keep the Master/Owner access level to 
smaller group. That would allow us to control things like force pushes to 
people who regularly take care about the packages.

While I have a high level of trust for the NM process, I believe it's 
better to have an option for fine-grained access.

I haven't looked at salsa.debian.org yet though, as spending time with 
family during the holidays was more fun ;)

Ondřej


On 2 January 2018 21.12.50 Bernhard Schmidt <berni at debian.org> wrote:

> On 02.01.2018 19:47, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> For the pdns packages, I'm considering sticking them into the
>>> collab-maint replacement on salsa.d.o.
>> Do you think all the pkg-dns debian packages should go into the
>> collab-maint replacement?  or do you think there's any value to having a
>> separate pkg-dns group?  I would love to see the collab-maint
>> replacement become *the* place to host debian packaging, so i'm
>> currently leaning toward collab-maint itself, but i could be convinced
>> if other people have a strong argument for a pkg-dns collection of
>> repos.
>
> I'm currently leaning towards the Debian group (successor of
> collab-maint on salsa) as well. On salsa only DDs have write access to
> all repositories in that group (guests need to be added explicitly on
> repository level), in contrast to alioth where guests added to
> collab-maint had write access to all repositories in collab-maint.
>
> Bernhard
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-dns-devel mailing list
> pkg-dns-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-dns-devel