[pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] [Debian] Re: eucalyptus_3.1.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[graziano obertelli]

Thanks Rudy.


On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 19:35 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:40:58AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > On 07/20/2012 10:38 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > Le Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit :
> > >> On 07/20/2012 03:32 AM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Reject Reasons:
> > >>> eucalyptus_3.1.0.orig.tar.gz file already exists in the new queue.
> > >>
> > >> Seems like a recent change. Sorry for that.
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I think that it may work by re-uploading eucalyptus_3.1.0-2_amd64.changes as an
> > > update of eucalyptus_3.1.0-1, that is, without the .orig.tar.gz.
> > Yes. I recall to have seen that.
> > 
> > > I think that 
> > > the archive software is enforcing consistency in the case both 3.1.0-1 and 3.1.0-2
> > > are accepted.
> > They should have checked that the MD5 is identical and not just have rejected it.
> > 
> 
> I did the right thing, so did dak, bumping revision to -2, but dch strangely removed the -1 from changelog so .changes included .orig.
> Should be OK now. I've just uploaded the new -2.
> 
> regards
> 

-- 
Graziano Obertelli
Eucalyptus Systems, Inc.