[pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] [Debian] Re: eucalyptus_3.1.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[brian.thomason at gmail.com]

Whoohoo!  Steffen, can you work your schmooze magic and see if you can
coax Luca into letting this in?

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 7:15 PM, graziano obertelli
<graziano at eucalyptus.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rudy.
>
>
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 19:35 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:40:58AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> > On 07/20/2012 10:38 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> > > Le Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit :
>> > >> On 07/20/2012 03:32 AM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Reject Reasons:
>> > >>> eucalyptus_3.1.0.orig.tar.gz file already exists in the new queue.
>> > >>
>> > >> Seems like a recent change. Sorry for that.
>> > >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I think that it may work by re-uploading eucalyptus_3.1.0-2_amd64.changes as an
>> > > update of eucalyptus_3.1.0-1, that is, without the .orig.tar.gz.
>> > Yes. I recall to have seen that.
>> >
>> > > I think that
>> > > the archive software is enforcing consistency in the case both 3.1.0-1 and 3.1.0-2
>> > > are accepted.
>> > They should have checked that the MD5 is identical and not just have rejected it.
>> >
>>
>> I did the right thing, so did dak, bumping revision to -2, but dch strangely removed the -1 from changelog so .changes included .orig.
>> Should be OK now. I've just uploaded the new -2.
>>
>> regards
>>
>
> --
> Graziano Obertelli
> Eucalyptus Systems, Inc.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers