[pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#211017: marked as done (fetchmail: crash
during mail fetch)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner at bugs.debian.org
Sat Jan 7 17:04:18 UTC 2006
Your message dated Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:54:16 +0100
with message-id <20060107155416.GC9391 at ngolde.de>
and subject line [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#211017: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2003 10:54:36 +0000
>From rene at rene-engelhard.de Mon Sep 15 05:54:33 2003
Return-path: <rene at rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.250]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19yr05-0000vN-00; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 05:54:33 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.220] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19yr05-0008F4-00
for submit at bugs.debian.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:54:33 +0200
Received: from [80.146.50.133] (helo=frodo)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19yr04-0006RM-00
for submit at bugs.debian.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:54:32 +0200
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1FF636265C; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:53:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:53:34 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <rene at debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org>
Subject: fetchmail: should support larger amounts of mails
Message-ID: <20030915105334.GC28325 at rene-engelhard.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vEao7xgI/oilGqZ+"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.28
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene at db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_14
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_14 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--vEao7xgI/oilGqZ+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.2.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
My provider at home at whose line my mailserver's connected to it not
reachable from the outside at the moment so I could not use my
mailserver for mails so disabled fetching there and decided to fetch
directly.
Unfortunately, this takes longer than I estimated. Today this happened:
rene at frodo:~$ fetchmail -k
fetchmail: removing stale lockfile
32938 messages (32064 seen) for 1545045 at pop.gmx.net (186756114 octets).
Segmentation fault
ok, it seems that the number of mails is too high for a variable..
Please support more...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE at euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE at euro
Versions of packages fetchmail depends on:
ii adduser 3.51 Add and remove users and groups
ii base-files 3.0.10 Debian base system miscellaneo=
us f
ii debconf 1.3.14 Debian configuration managemen=
t sy
ii debianutils 2.5.5 Miscellaneous utilities specif=
ic t
hi libc6 2.3.2-5 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7b-2 SSL shared libraries
-- debconf information:
fetchmail/initdefaultswarn:=20
fetchmail/runasroot: false
* fetchmail/confwarn:=20
fetchmail/fetchidswarn:=20
* fetchmail/systemwide: false
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene at debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--vEao7xgI/oilGqZ+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ZZot+FmQsCSK63MRAvMeAJ0a6pSjD/dI0QnpR5FX7ItkmGcW+ACeJI2h
iPh450DBXxhesBErsgKNo9g=
=JKXd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vEao7xgI/oilGqZ+--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 211017-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2006 16:53:55 +0000
>From nico at ngolde.de Sat Jan 07 08:53:55 2006
Return-path: <nico at ngolde.de>
Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de ([81.169.145.165])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvHKF-0007Zx-GG
for 211017-done at bugs.debian.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:53:55 -0800
Received: from ngolde.de (e178122064.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.122.64])
by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k07GrqUA003727;
Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:53:53 +0100 (MET)
Received: by ngolde.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BB703530168; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:54:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:54:16 +0100
From: Nico Golde <nico at ngolde.de>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de>
Cc: 211017-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#211017: (no subject)
Message-ID: <20060107155416.GC9391 at ngolde.de>
References: <20060107140142.GA5812 at ngolde.de> <m3hd8g5c20.fsf at merlin.emma.line.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3hd8g5c20.fsf at merlin.emma.line.org>
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.4 (2005 Oct 15, compiled Dec 23 2005 00:53:36)
X-Mailer: Mutt-ng http://www.muttng.org
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux sid
X-My-Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de
User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r556 (Debian)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
* Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de> [2006-01-07 16:24]:
> Nico Golde <nico at ngolde.de> writes:
>=20
> > do you agree to close the bug for now and see if it happens=20
> > one time with the new version? It has been a long time since=20
> > the report.
>=20
> Note you did not Cc: rene.
As bug submitter he will get a copy of this.
> I didn't notice this bug, it was lacking the upstream tag.
Yes :(
> I'd vote to close this, 3 months are more than enough to respond.
> I think it should be policy to unconditionally close every "moreinfo"
> bug when the requested information does not arrive within 2 months.
Mhm there were controversial mails about it on=20
debian-devel... But in this case you are definetly right.
> I ask the Debian maintainers to routinely ask for configuration
> information (.fetchmailrc without passwords), fetchmail -vv information,
> exact information how to reproduce a problem, and in the case of a
> crash, for a backtrace too, or at least strace.
[...]=20
So I close the bug.
Regards Nico
--=20
Nico Golde - JAB: nion at jabber.ccc.de | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!
--MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDv+QoHYflSXNkfP8RAj3EAJ4yIS97sJ42K7zXA+Y2nfucsiUjUwCfemZP
wfcvykFHJtFqX3+J7sqvc0g=
=e43q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd--
More information about the pkg-fetchmail-maint
mailing list