Bug#701590: lightspark: FTBFS on powerpcspe

Roland Stigge stigge at antcom.de
Thu Feb 28 14:11:52 UTC 2013


Hi,

On 02/28/2013 01:00 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Would it be possible to refactor that patch to have the dpkg-specific handling 
> in debian/rules (as CMAKE argument like -DDISABLE_ALTIVEC for example) instead 
> of directly in the CMakeLists.txt ? This would widely help pushing that fix to 
> upstream.

I'm attaching two patches (for debian/rules, and for upstream, resp.),
that should do exactly this.

> By the way, if you could test-compile lightspark from experimental, that would 
> be a nice input for upstream too.

Yes - just done, builds fine, with exactly the same patches applied.

Roland
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rules.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 616 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-flash-devel/attachments/20130228/e4733df9/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lightspark-upstream.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-flash-devel/attachments/20130228/e4733df9/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the pkg-flash-devel mailing list