[pkg-fso-maint] openmoko-panel-plugin v0.5

Joachim Breitner mail at joachim-breitner.de
Tue Nov 4 21:39:09 UTC 2008


Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 04.11.2008, 22:15 +0100 schrieb Luca Capello:
> > The repository is layed out like this:
> 
> Sounds good, but there is no master branch, is it on purpose?  If we
> leave it like this, we should change the HEAD to refers the debian
> branch, so at least gitweb shows some patches.

It’s on purpose, to avoid confusion. I changed the HEAD.

> > In this particular case, where upstream is actually providing Debian
> > packages, I put my own changes (mostly the improved setup.py for png
> > inclusion) in a new debian revision 0.5-1.1. That is the package that I
> > have uploaded now as well
> 
> This sounds reasonable, but I would always put an NMU line into the
> Debian changelog.

I don’t consider it really a NMU, it’s just a modified package one level
down in the stream of software, more compareable to how Ubuntu changes
Debian packages again. So it’s a regular Debian sub-reversion :-)

 For an NMU, I’m an advocate of the explicit -nmu1 versioning theme.

> However, I would say that the correct solution is upstream stopping
> distributing Debian packages, since openmoko-panel-plugin is
> *officially* hosted on the pkg-fso repository.  Eventually this is how
> it must be, at least when we will upload the package to Debian main.
>
> Sebastian, do you mind joining the Debian FSO Team?

Yes, it would probably make things easier. OTOH, if he prefers to
maintain the package in the upstream SVN repository, that should be ok
as well. In that case, we could continue importing the source tarballs
he releases, but continue maintaining our debian/-directory
independently (but checking what changes he does in the debian/ dir in
SVN).

> > Sorry, gismo, but I was too lazy to put that in a dpatch :-]. Maybe
>                                                     ^^^^^^
> > later.
> 
> I think you misspelled it, s/dpatch/quilt/ ;-)

Cought me :-)

> A small note: importing the Debian patch 0.5-1 [1] deleted the two
> debian/changelog entries for versions 0.4-1.1 and 0.4-1.2.  For the sake
> of correctness, I would add them back.

Ok, I’ll do that.

Greetings,
Joachim
-- 
Joachim Breitner
  e-Mail: mail at joachim-breitner.de
  Homepage: http://www.joachim-breitner.de
  ICQ#: 74513189
  Jabber-ID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20081104/443c0260/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list