[pkg-fso-maint] Renaming gsm0710muxd?
luca at pca.it
Thu Feb 19 11:17:13 UTC 2009
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:21:28 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 20:39 +0100 schrieb Sascha Wessel:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:43:49PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
>> > The major problem, however, is that as soon as we switch to it we will
>> > probably need an fso-frameworkd snapshot. And this will delay any
>> > fso-frameworkd upload to main, again.
>> AFAIK, another problem is its build dependency on valac 0.5.6 + 
>> (this patch is not yet in upstreams svn ).
> thanks a lot for the information. The vala thingy makes it a
> showstopper for us (sometime I envy openembedded, fixing anything
> anywhere at will :-)).
> So we should go via fso-gsm0710muxd for now.
Which means that every reference to gsm0710muxd must be changed to
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 19:43 +0100 schrieb Luca Capello:
>> But Josh (who just subscribed this list) from the pyNeo team has
>> > already created Debian packages for their software,
>> Are you saying that there is another Debian package called gsm0710muxd
>> and this is different from the pkg-fso one? I hope Josh's package has
>> never gone public yet, otherwise we are in a very bad situation, which
>> adds more to the already shitty one.
> He created it privately, but has not yet published it. It will be
> distributed, once I reviewed it, via the pkg-fso repositories, so no
I would directly to go main, we have already lost too much time with the
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20090219/d9d78dc9/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-fso-maint