[pkg-fso-maint] shared library in binary-package?
Heiko Stübner
heiko at sntech.de
Wed Sep 9 12:01:45 UTC 2009
Hi,
Am Mittwoch 09 September 2009 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> I see.
>
> However, I doubt about this change.
>
> It is causing lintian errors, not warnings.
> It caused removal of ldconfig calls in postinst/postrm, which looks
> incorrect.
> Amarok package, that is our 'precenent', does install shlibs.
>
> I suggest to revert this change, at least for now.
ok I have reverted the change.
The current packaging also seems not to be completely wrong as ftp-masters
have accepted the package.
The license mismatch I forwarded to Mickey which he fixed in their git.
About the config-patch (and a new frameworkd upload):
As I don't really know the current status and inner workings of the config and
frameworkd packages I hesitated from simply changing them afraid of breaking
to much - so the config-patch still sitts in the mail to the list and waits.
But as it seems that both Joachim and Luca are on some kind of hiatus do you
think it would be better to just upload the two packages and then simply try
to fix the things that break? Or do you know when Joachim or Luca will be back?
Heiko
More information about the pkg-fso-maint
mailing list