[pkg-fso-maint] shared library in binary-package?

[Nikita V. Youshchenko]

> The license mismatch I forwarded to Mickey which he fixed in their git.

Good.
I see no reason to make a new upload just to fix this license thing.

> About the config-patch (and a new frameworkd upload):
> As I don't really know the current status and inner workings of the
> config and frameworkd packages I hesitated from simply changing them
> afraid of breaking to much - so the config-patch still sitts in the mail
> to the list and waits.

Seems like frameworkd package is seriously outdated compared to upstream, 
and that does cause complains [1] [2]. Also I guess this stops us from 
packaging tasty things such as litephone or PISI.

[1]http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-userland/2009-September/001916.html
[2]http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2009-September/054772.html

If you know enough about frameworkd, and have time and will to prepare a 
more up-to-date package(s) and then fix whatever bugs will be reported, it 
would be excellent if you go forward on that :).

> Or do you know when Joachim or Luca will be back?

No

Nikita
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20090909/a2c4e86d/attachment.pgp>