[pkg-fso-maint] Open fso bug reports

Sebastian Reichel elektranox at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 14:01:26 UTC 2010


On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:17:29AM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'm currently trying to process all bugs that are not assigned to a
> valid package.  What's the status of all these fso bugs?  I thought
> those fso packages would enter Debian "RSN" but it seems this still
> hasn't happened.
> 
> Do you think it will happen soon?  If not, do you think you can track
> your bugs somewhere else?
> 
> The BTS is really not meant for bugs for external packages and what
> you said would be a temporary thing has become a permanent one.
> -- 
> Martin Michlmayr
> http://www.cyrius.com/

Hi,

uhm what packages do you mean exactly? I think most of our packages
can be found in the Debian repository [1]. I saw you CC'd a bug in
the openmoko kernel package yesterday (the bug report never reached
this ML before btw) - this package is NOT intended to get into
Debian. There are plans to create a linux-image-s3c package once
there is proper upstream support (afaik display support is still
missing). I guess we can handle bugs in the openmoko-kernel package
in this ML until there is a proper Debian package.

Can you please tell me which other fso packages you are talking
about?

[1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-fso-maint%40lists.alioth.debian.org&comaint=yes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20100212/e6f4396d/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list