[pkg-fso-maint] Anyone working on packaging libeflvala (EFL Vala Bindings)? Or should I attempt to do so?

[Visti Andresen]

On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:31:13 +0200
Sebastian Reichel <elektranox at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:20:58AM +0200, Visti Andresen wrote:
> > 
> > Which brings me to the question "Is anyone working on packaging
> > libeflvala?"
> 
> I planned to do so, but I did no work so far, so I'm happy if you do
> the work :)

Ok, I will see if I can get it done this weekend.

> 
> > If no, then I have two additional questions:
> > 
> > What should the package be called?
> > ----------------------------------
> 
> I would have called it 'efl-vala'. This fits to 'gupnp-vala' and
> 'efl-dev'.

I suppose it is settled then, efl-vala it is :)

> 
> > Package version number?
> > -----------------------
> > Any preferences/best practice hints?
> 
> fso-frameworkd has real versions (which is the 0.9.5.9 part), but we
> switch to revisions between two version, thus the +git20100131 part.
> 
> 
> Now that I answered your questions some more comments:
> 
> You want to package [1] and not the stuff from git.fso.org! Apart
> from this there is a version number: 0.5.0 (check configure.ac)

As long as I am using a git version i suppose that I should suffix the
0.5.0 with a .something and the git revision?
(As there might be more than one git revision with the same
version.major.minor number)

Thank you very much indeed, a most helpful set of comments

> 
> -- Sebastian
> 
> [1] http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/BINDINGS/vala