[pkg-fso-maint] FSO2 packaging
rico at bierrommel.de
Thu Aug 11 07:42:57 UTC 2011
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2011, 06:27:16 schrieb Sebastian Reichel:
> * do not overwrite valid lintian warnings:
> - fso-gsmd: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/fsogsmd
OK, i will remove it.
> * Instead of calling autogen + maintainer-clean we should use
> * I guess we should switch from cdbs to dh with compat level >= 8
Why not cdbs? We would just have to include autoreconf.mk.
> * Why did you include patchsys-quilt?
> Hint: the package is in "3.0 (quilt)" format
Without patchsys-quilt patches are not reverted by debian/rules clean. Is it
the intention or maybe a bug?
> * Since we're updating all packages anyway: should we introduce
Can somebody assists? Not everything in debians multiarch policy is clear to
> * It's enough to build the per device packages for the
> device's architecture (armel)
This could be done. Are all supported devices armel? And how about armhf
> * All libs in /usr/lib should be in a libXYZ package and need a
> stable API. So either we put libfsogsm into a new package
> libfsogsm and take cares of its api OR we install it to another
> I think we should install it to /usr/lib/fso.
How about /usr/lib/cornucopia? This is default for plugins.
Should all fso-libs go there?
> * please let's do another upload to experimental
Thanks for response
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the pkg-fso-maint