[pkg-fso-maint] Uncoordinated libfsotransport transition

Sebastian Reichel sre at debian.org
Thu May 24 06:51:07 UTC 2012


Hi Cyril,

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:26:52AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libfsotransport0
> to libfsotransport1. That can be seen on the excuses page, and that
> explains why your package isn't migrating:

We plan to switch away from git prereleases to the real releases
(coming this week). According to upstream (I did not have a look at
it yet) there will be another bump of libfsotransport to
libfsotransport2 and a bump of libgsm0710mux0 to libgsm0710mux1.

This also includes new versions of fso-deviced, fso-gsmd and
libgsm0710mux, so we can skip the binNMU.

> | libfsotransport (0.9.8+git20110805-1 to 0.9.8+git20120308-1)
> | 
> |     Maintainer: Debian FreeSmartphone.Org Team
> |     55 days old (needed 10 days)
> |     out of date on armel: libfsotransport0 (from 0.9.8+git20110805-1)
> |     out of date on armhf: libfsotransport0 (from 0.9.8+git20110805-1) (but armhf isn't keeping up, so nevermind)
> |     Not considered 
> 
> See: http://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html#libfsotransport
> 
> Trying to remove the old binary packages would lead to breaking the
> following packages, which therefore need binNMUs, hoping they won't
> FTBFS:

binNMU should work without FTBFS, but as I said we will update the
packages this week, so I guess binNMU is not needed.

> | # Broken Depends:
> | fso-deviced: fso-deviced [amd64 armhf i386 ia64 powerpc s390 s390x sparc]
> |              fso-deviced-htc [armhf]
> |              fso-deviced-n900 [armhf]
> |              fso-deviced-palmpre [armhf]
> |              fso-deviced-player-canberra [amd64 armhf i386 ia64 powerpc s390 s390x sparc]
> |              fso-deviced-player-gstreamer [amd64 armhf i386 ia64 powerpc s390 s390x sparc]
> | fso-gsmd: fso-gsmd [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 powerpc s390 s390x sparc]
> |           fso-gsmd-ezx [armel]
> |           fso-gsmd-htc [armel armhf]
> |           fso-gsmd-openmoko [armel]
> | libfsotransport: libfsotransport-dbg [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc]
> |                  libfsotransport-dev [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc]
> | libgsm0710mux: libgsm0710mux0 [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc]
> 
> Next time, please coordinate with us, we have been trying to get the
> message across during the past few years through messages to dda@, and
> we have documentation on the process:
>   https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

pkg-fso is the Maintainer of all reverse dependencies, so I assumed
that coordination with the release team is not strictly needed. I
will send a message next time.

-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20120524/fd9b81c8/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list